Non-degeneracy is the key criterion for me. It is trivial to produce a "decentralized community" that nominally checks off the feature list, but produces nothing more complex than online conversations. The question is can it do more? Can it wage wars or launch space programs?
Conversation
I do think several examples come close for brief periods, both positive and negative. Like periods in open-source projects or guerrilla wars or festivals. But it's not a well-developed or fully-theorized form of organization compared to say corporations, markets, or republics.
5
1
24
I mean, come on, starlings are stupid swarming little feathered rats, but don’t you think there’s some intriguing possibility here?
GIF
read image description
ALT
4
20
This is an earnestpost thread version of a more satirical take I did back in 2015
3
1
16
Is “vision” really so useless?
I can think of a couple relatively long-term projects in my actual work, that I’m confident should be done. And the ability to consistently make incremental progress on a long-term project requires something I was calling “vision”.
1
2
“Vision” as I understand it is simply the ability to imagine a future state better than the present state and map out a plausible way of getting there. It sounds really basic, and it feels really basic, but in my experience few people can do it?!
1
4
Or at any rate, I observe hardly anyone making plans, and people act really impressed when they see a plan.
2
1
4
I suppose the alternate explanation is that plans never work, so people know better than to plan new initiatives, and when they act impressed, it’s flattery.
2
Often it is genuinely being impressed and not flattery. Mostly people are impressed by the visible conscientiousness and proof-of-caring. Many can plan. But few care enough about anything to do so. Visible planning is not vision though. It’s proof of seriousness.
1
4
That plans fail is irrelevant and people get that and value proof anyway. “Plans are nothing, planning is everything” —Eisenhower. Most people unconsciously grok this and value evidence of planning appropriately.

