Conversation

Replying to
To get to the post-textual, post-verbal era, when words are for AIs and humans have to think in post-latent spaces where the AIs can’t reach, gotta get past this kind of reverence. We’re overdue for some healthy disrespect.
1
16
Someday (“when the tonguin’ is done”), we’ll see the age of books for what it has been: the first stage of the creation of cognitive fossil fuels. The real prize is the oil forming inside AIs right now.
2
14
Realizing I’m mildly triggered by any behavior that vaguely resembles prayer without actually being prayer in a traditional religious sense. Actual prayer I can tune out and ignore. But prayer directed at books, constitutions, music, art, Straussian Great Men... annoying.
1
7
There’s some story, I forget source, about a tyrant who promised not to burn a library of a conquered land but got around it by putting all their words in alphabetical order or something. I kinda like the spirit of that story a lot.
1
Books are basically a historically contingent form factor for a much richer collective computing process. It’s a mistake to think that they’re the only UX for the underlying collective stream of consciousness let alone the best one.
6
16
Death of the author ftw. Mainlining Borg mind stream without the intercessionary figure of the author confusing matters by invoking some sort of platonic realm of idea traditions.
2
5
Replying to
It’s not that they’re going to be entirely obsolete. They’ll just become one specialized UX among many for a subset of hive mind access.
2
4
I mean I’m writing one now (serialized) but only 1 in 3 of my book-sized ideas is also *book-shaped.* And that just shows my age/rigidities (and tbh hangover of youthful vanities). I suspect other things being equal, Zoomers will have 1 in 10 ideas in book form.
1
9