Feedback needed! What's wrong or missing from this 2x2?
I'm trying to make the case that scientific investing is *missing* an important type of investment manager: the YC or angel investor for science. Someone with high autonomy making lots of small bets.
Conversation
1
1
Replying to
Why do you need the second 2x2 at all? Are the budget/autonomy axes wrong for science philanthropy? Looks like you’re arguing a missing coverage zone on outer 2x2. There’s no fundamental difference between science and commercial technology investing here unless you make one.
2
1
Ie your color coding of phrases is enough. When I make nested 2x2s they introduce entirely new axis pairs and fit entirely within 1 quadrant of the outer one

