I still don’t get the point with this stuff. Do I understand correctly that you get no rights or control. Just a claim to own the “original”? Or does that vary depending on the specific NFT?
Conversation
Replying to
This feels a bit like having a star named after you by some sketchy org tbh.
1
1
32
Replying to
It can vary. But from my experience in the comics/licensed character space, you never get reproduction rights when you buy and original or limited edition print; it's only about owning the original created and authenticated by the artist.
1
Replying to
The other really big deal here is smart contract integration, which means the original artist can get a taste of the revenue every time a piece changes hands. Can help addresss the issue of collectors who make a fortune exploiting artists & reselling at a profit
2
7
Replying to
4
Replying to
@levihazherpes's account is temporarily unavailable because it violates the Twitter Media Policy. Learn more.
Replying to
Yeah and doing flexible acls on-chain is an unsolved problem on which this whole market hinges
Replying to
Depends on what the creator has decided to sell. In the music space, I’ve seen an experiment by a well-known producer where he sold publishing rights [cash-flowing asset] to a song that is a leap ahead of what others have done so far.
1
1
3
Replying to
Per , NFTs are a scene, so perhaps people are just signaling that they’re buying into this current wave of the crypto scene
2
Replying to
It varies by project. With , for example, the owners are granted specific rights/control to the underlying art: thehashmasks.com/terms
1
1








