Conversation

Replying to
They are social registers created out of thin air. I get the urge. I get that something of value exists in manufactured exclusivity. I do not get how so many young people can justify participating in a scheme that is actively awful for climate change.
1
7
Replying to
The crypto-concern is one of the more meaningless pieces of bs in climate conversations. It’s nowhere near a top lever on decarbonization, already trending down or negative carbon (for eg due to replacing gas flaring) and is an issue *purely* because it targets “right” villains
1
12
Replying to and
The biggest levers are unfortunately either the least sexy (eg: home heating/cooling improvements through insulation), most difficult (densification) or simply require years of tedious engineering work building up a stack (transport reform from EVs to renewable sources).
1
9
Replying to and
I’ve pretty much written off climate activists as really bad faith. Their revealed preferences for issues to push on a priority basis show little to no concern for/engagement with climate per se, and unacknowledged primary focus on social justice causes.
Replying to and
It’s actually a disservice to both causes to pretend to care about climate as a vehicle for pursuing aims in social justice. The real problem with crypto is not climate but that it’s a non-inclusive, inequality-exacerbating new engine of wealth (very real, despite being digital)
1
6
Replying to and
My problem with NFTs is that they don’t go far enough — the opposite of your concern. As for crypto’s political problems... I’d like to see it become part of the solution to inequality, rather than amplifier. Still, it’s already way more inclusive than traditional finance.
3
4
Show replies