Hmm. Vaguely interesting but the whole thread rests on the well-posedness of GIs via human brains being an existence proof, and therefore the well-posedness of the AGI question.
I think I’ve gone hardline on the idea that humans are not in fact GIs, and the idea of a GI is bogus
Quote Tweet
Why doesn’t a good negative history of attempts to get to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) exist? What is it about AGI that makes such a treatment not only hard to find, but hard to create?
In this thread, I’ll propose reasons for
1) hard to find, and
2) hard to create
Show this thread


