Conversation

Replying to
For those who don’t follow this stuff, the piece literally had nothing to work with except pure guilt by association and suggestion several degrees removed and what appears to be saving face/playing victim re the blog deletion drama 🙄
3
98
This story is the equivalent of someone doing a story on NYT claiming Maggie Haberman was a magahead based on her access journalism compromises, and Dean Baquet secretly a Nazi because the op ed section featured Tom Cotton that one time.
3
74
The NYT and SV are basically trying to cancel each other at this point. It’s the mother of all stupid conflicts. It’s frankly the main reason I’ve kinda drifted out of the larger scene to a large extent. I want no part of this.
2
92
The tech scene is just a place I do consulting work now, and increasingly at layers close enough to the actual tech stuff that I can thankfully afford to ignore the higher cultural layers.
1
46
I suspect the NYT is mortally afraid of facing competition as the monopoly source of cultural authority. Is this why this why they also beef with Los Angeles as a city? 🧐
1
63
The piece also reveals a basic incomprehension of how SV works. It’s just very open-access and everybody talks to everybody, makes intros, etc. Doesn’t imply influence or agreement. To the NY mind, I suspect it looks like a conspiracy because that’s what it *would* mean in NY.
1
67
If I had as much access in NY or DC as I do in SV, I could probably start a small war. In SV, it just means I might score an occasional free lunch or warm lead for a gig.
4
56
Replying to
Would you say Balaji comes off worst, of all those pulled into the web of association? I thought so. Which nicely frames the NYT piece itself in the latest chapter of today's culture wars, given the knights & mooks on each side.
1
2
Show replies