The aha! idea is that this Maslow-based idea of somebody being "there" at a given level of integrity of self to be helped actually generalizes quite a bit, and is not dependent on a Maslow-ish hierarchical view of self.
Replying to
Quote Tweet
You can't help with physiological needs if they're not "there" at safety. You can't help with safety if they're not there at "belonging". You can't help at "belonging" if they're not "there" at esteem. You cannot help with esteem if they're not "there" at self-actualization.
Show this thread
2
1
7
