And service robotics in last mile and distribution is going to be much bigger than manufacturing. Consumerization of robotics.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Yea totally, but I'm saying that there aren't many big robotics companies here to lobby for these gov't measures. I suspect it'll be more organic, but I hope I'm wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickPinkston
Yeah I agree. I think there’s a cost inflection point coming, like 2000 for software startups. Cost of robotics startups should plummet, as some of the AI gets dirt cheap and hardware gets commodity/open-source. Trigger is renewables plus falling lithium-ion costs.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @NickPinkston
I think a lot of the push will come from green. Same tasks at lower, greener energy cost. Delivery, distribution, simple service. Human operators run on carbon-based energy. AI is more near-zero-marginal-cost enabler after initial training costs. Training = capex. Energy = opex.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
Electric power is already cheaper than caloric power though, so while power density has real practical implications, I don't think electric costs are much of a real barrier. Brains are harder than muscles (not to say robot hardware is solved, far from it)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickPinkston
Point of use price is not the same as production price. Non-grid-rechargeable batteries are like orders of magnitude higher per watt and still sell briskly. They’re like photographic film in ~2000. I think of “electrify everything at pennies/kWh” as an unfinished 120y old project
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
Numbers don't seem to work though. Maintenance / ops is generally way more than power cost in true robotics (ie not high power machine tools) if we're talking unit cost. This is true of CapEx and OpEx.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickPinkston
I think reliability is going to increase very rapidly
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
Remember it's maintenance and ops, and the latter could be a big problem unless telepresence get really advanced. It's unclear how good maintenance can get. Cars, computers, etc. are at very high unit volume while still being expensive to maintain.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I’m thinking 20 year horizons here, not 4
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I am too. Cars and 6 sigma have been around for a long time. Sigmas likely run into transistor-size style physical constraints, requiring new modes of automated maintenance, which is possible, but we'll see.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.