Yeah but China tensions will change incentives quite a bit I think.
Conversation
Replying to
If we wake up... There aren't a lot of big robotics companies here actually, more Europe / Japan. Perhaps self-driving and tech in general could change that.
I think we have a big advantage to press, but we'll see if it's possible to get it done.
1
1
Replying to
I suspect reshoring and automation = PB&J. The more China automates, the more the only reason to manufacture there is about dirty energy. Renewables change that. I am betting energy-intensive commodities and intermediates stay in China, light energy finishing robot-reshored.
1
1
2
And service robotics in last mile and distribution is going to be much bigger than manufacturing. Consumerization of robotics.
1
1
Replying to
Yea totally, but I'm saying that there aren't many big robotics companies here to lobby for these gov't measures. I suspect it'll be more organic, but I hope I'm wrong.
1
1
Replying to
Yeah I agree. I think there’s a cost inflection point coming, like 2000 for software startups. Cost of robotics startups should plummet, as some of the AI gets dirt cheap and hardware gets commodity/open-source. Trigger is renewables plus falling lithium-ion costs.
1
2
Replying to
I think a lot of the push will come from green. Same tasks at lower, greener energy cost. Delivery, distribution, simple service. Human operators run on carbon-based energy. AI is more near-zero-marginal-cost enabler after initial training costs. Training = capex. Energy = opex.
1
1
Replying to
Electric power is already cheaper than caloric power though, so while power density has real practical implications, I don't think electric costs are much of a real barrier. Brains are harder than muscles (not to say robot hardware is solved, far from it)
2
1
If you want robots, fight to increase how much humans get paid. You taught me that, Nick. No job will ever be done by a robot that can be done by an underpaid gig worker.
2
1
I think this has causality backwards. Automation is driven by falling costs, and labor prices change in response. Making labor more expensive is an accelerant but the underlying trend is an independent variable. Even huge labor surpluses like India don’t actually act as a brake.
It works both ways, but Greg's point is still true though right?
It's like how coal power got fucked by the trend of solar before the price of the latter was at parity. Min wage could be similar.
2


