You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Had a thought that sqrt(n) to n^2 via n is a vastly more important phenomenon than 0 to 1. sqrt(n) = random walk n = muddling through (filtered random walk) n^2 = network effect This is what things like product-market fit really are.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/1350190715867865088 …
0 to 1 is a sort of Great Man narrative conceit. You went from nothing to something like a god saying “let there be light!” When you dig into the history of any apparent 0 to 1 qualitative level-up, you invariably find a sqrt(n) to n^2 continuous inflection point story
And this isn’t just because I’ve gradually come to really dislike Peter Thiel.
ha there's something in that hamming book like this
This seems quite true. But as a headline, "Sqrt[n] -> n^2" won't really fly off the shelves. Needs the Gladwell "catchy phrase for people who don't really want to bother with the math" treatment.
The gladwell crowd is a sqrt(n) bunch I don’t want to deal with anyway 
why did you choose n^2 instead of like e^n?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
