wassn’t sure I had parsed “trad” properly bc it’s super gender-y, and “rigidly/reductively/partially” didn’t seem “agender” to me, just kinda “a-fluidity”... and wokeism also seems kinda a-fluid RE gender categories too... so was p sure I was misunderstanding some axis or square
Conversation
the professionalism x {capital, rent seeking} x {reproductive production RE gender} is 👩🍳😘 EXCELLENT
and I think I got kind of sniped staring at wokeism in that lens and being like “what is rent seeking here hmmmm mmm”
2
1
RIGHT, there is something dimensionality-reduced here, that confuses things.
i wanted both anti-gender and a-gender, and i wanted to evoke more stuff about the tension between power and phenomenonlogy. there's more axes and polarities that are clearly there
2
1
1
oooh what I really want is “pro/anti-gender” and “pro/anti-fluidity” as like a... third axis (oh no)
bc RE social justice, earlier feminist thought is pro-gender anti-fluidity anti-natal
whereas modern queer social justice is pro-gender pro-fluidity anti-natal ...
2
1
“Artificial wombs for all” transhumanist is anti-gender pro-fluidity pro-natal...
2
1
congrats you’ve successfully sniped me utterly with this in a good way 😅
1
2
a 2x2x2 is only eight boxes it can’t be that hard
1
3



