You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I’d like to know if they distinguish in-small-world density from overall density including weak/non-local links. But am feeling too lazy to actually read... cc @vinaydebrouhttps://twitter.com/mutual_ayyde/status/1349545175517782017 …
To my own point (may be unrelated to point of paper), in academia, I suspect being densely networked within a discipline increases your chances of finishing a PhD, getting a job, getting tenure etc. But being interdisciplinarily densely networked probably worsens chances.
In the US, I suspect being densely networked within a smaller city and/or sectoral oligarch network gets you a winning GOP ticket more easily, gerrymandered for your convenience. Big city/global network or Pan-sectoral wealth connections (banking etc) gets you Democratic ticket.
Barabasi is the place to start here. Broadly, you are correct, but there are nuances based on discipline. Note that many disciplines fall into a too small to be international (art), too big to be neighborhood (systems theory) lacuna
This applies in consulting/ advisory work based on my experience
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
