How come Quillette hasn’t stepped into the breach by standing up a Parler-lite
It’s like this is a heaven-sent opportunity for them to level up a tier
-
Show this thread
-
Why do I have the sneaking suspicion nobody with serious media ambitions actually wants this audience anymore, even though it’s well-off enough to advertise oceans of supplements and edc stuff to
3 replies 2 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
“I’ll defend to the death my right to quote Voltaire and Orwell at the libs who kicked you out of the public square, but could you very special people, err... not come to my site right now? It’s not that we don’t want you, but we’re... errr redoing the css wallpaper”
4 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
Even Fox is quietly shuffling off to the sides while publishing headlines with words like “muzzling” even though it would be trivial for them to set up the biggest Mastodon server overnight to grab this moment.
1 reply 2 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
Though you’d need a scaling expert, having participated in setting up a modestly active mastodon, this really is not that hard. There’s an audience of tens of millions up for grabs. Maybe there just hadn’t been enough time and there will be a bunch of land-grab efforts soon.
3 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Nobody is actually defending the stated line of concern and building a pure paradigm free-speech platform. And there’s enough billionaires pretending to defend that line that they could even set up a CDN network and a data center.
4 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
I don’t care to convince anyone of my own position on these matters, but I do care about vague suggestions of monopoly and “de facto public square” crap. That’s just not true and I don’t want it being accepted as such. Twitter is *a* public square, not *the* public square.
3 replies 3 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
This is what is known in the business as a high-maintenance audience. A crowd it’s costly to serve a self-speaking platform to, but doesn’t fit the “speak for the voiceless” pattern either.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted 💎 Emily / aiju 💎
Possibly true, but a) there are/have been many brilliant techies who are/would have been Trumpies (Shockley, Metcalfe,... Palmer Luckey probably counts too) b) there are many who probably can’t fix their own tech problems (artists etc) who I do want to hear fromhttps://twitter.com/the_aiju/status/1348048061755498507 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
It’s not that they can’t do what’s necessary. It’s that they know they’ll never be the majority, and they want recognition of their preferred rules of engagement on the majority platform. They don’t want to admit they’re merely disliked by a majority without being oppressed.
1 reply 3 retweets 25 likesShow this thread
So their options are to either get autocratic imposition of their preferred rules (say whatever, whenever, to whoever, without consequences) or hide disingenuously behind pretended belief in lofty principles they argue should be installed above an imagined tyranny of the majority
-
-
Replying to @vgr
If the discouraging cost of running such media infrastructure is the constant need to respond to law enforcement, moderation, takedowns, etc, the logical conclusion from economic efficiency is that law enforcement should run the servers themselves and host it all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mengwong
Yeah, the common carrier/utility argument. Never going to work outside of China.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.