The *only* things I’ve seen steer or accelerate the dev path are: 1. Getting the right kind of romantic partner 2. Significant change in geography *and* everyday social network 3. Significant change in source of income
-
Show this thread
-
Working on “educating” people on stuff you’ve picked up 5 minutes ago is a sign of weak convictions. This young man, to the extent he’s not setting up a grift, is not yet radicalized. Frontline evangelism is for the shakily attached. To get those senpai notices for bigger things.
2 replies 0 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
What radicalizes is a traumatizing *choice* that leaves a visible scar you cannot hide. Good seasoned radical leaders try to arrange opportunities to acquire such scars. It’s not the gang tattoo but the thing you do to get it.
1 reply 3 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
The Cobra Kai S3 has an excellent example of such an incident: When Hawk is faced with the choice to break the arm of his once-best-friend Dmitri. What happens next? Watch that truly excellent t show to find out
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
The medium is the message though. Every cohort faces a different pattern of radicalizing threat dependent on medium. In my coming-of-age time, pre-Internet (graduated high school in 92-93), it was some sort of physical-setting public humiliation. Now it’s often online cancelation
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
Notice the comfort he appears to take in attaching labels to himself (paleoconservative, Republican values, social conservative, white nationalist). In someone 10 years older, there would be defensive reluctance in accepting labels because by then you’ve learned the cost.
3 replies 0 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
By around 40, even the dimmest person has recognized that labels are like taxes. You want the minimum you can get away with. You certainly don’t celebrate them. But 18-30 or so, they seem like prestigious “free” prizes. Participation trophies.
5 replies 8 retweets 69 likesShow this thread -
I think one reason I never ventured down such paths (besides the wrong temperament) is I’ve never tried to join any social circle or made a bid for acceptance in any group that didn’t express active interest in me. The “inner ring” syndrome is something I’m weirdly immune to.
4 replies 0 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
I’ve always been way too busy chasing down non-social bunnytrails of personal interest that can be pursued alone and don’t involve forming opinions of other humans. That seems to confer some sort of immunity.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
As a teenager, most of my surplus attention was on astronomy, airplanes, history of science, “how things worked” books, world history, wildlife. Pure nerdery. I was smart enough to process and navigate social stuff easily but did not get actually interested in them till my 30s.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Daniel Pritchett
Interesting. I don’t think I’ve ever presented as subversive except when I intended to. “Accidentally subversive” doesn’t really compute for me. Factoring in social context is pretty much unconscious second nature, not something I have to consciously try to care about.https://twitter.com/DPritchett/status/1347960116079980545 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I’ve found it easy to inadvertently leak signals of disinterest in authority even when I’m not explicitly working at cross purposes. Folks can respond quickly and firmly to the reassert the hierarchies fundamental to their mental models.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DPritchett @vgr
Some folks expect deference or at least tacit acknowledgement of their perceived status differences.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.