Axe-grinder here, hi It’s not that crackpots are “almost always” right But on “almost every” topic, *some* crackpot is right-er than institutions Crackpot truth high watermark always higher+faster than inst For best results, survey crackpots for best, not institutions for avghttps://twitter.com/vgr/status/1346324137409581057 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @harmonylion1
This is a fairly weak claim. About as strong as the law of large numbers. Like how somebody will guess the lottery numbers right. If you can’t a priori identify the one right-er crackpot, you’re basically saying nothing.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr @harmonylion1
Putanumonit Jacob Retweeted Putanumonit Jacob
The skill of identified the right crackpot is real and can be practiced: * Look at the actual numbers * Consider incentives of info sources * See who makes bets, has skin in the game * Have friends whose epistemology you trust * Read LessWronghttps://twitter.com/yashkaf/status/1336032400174964736 …
Putanumonit Jacob added,
Putanumonit Jacob @yashkafI should probably explain what I mean when I say things like "rationalists and some internet forums were right on COVID when experts were wrong". I don't mean that rationality makes you better at epidemiology that epidemiologists. https://twitter.com/vidur_kapur/status/1245641609602985986 …Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @yashkaf @harmonylion1
Damn you guys never stop with the proselytizing
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr @harmonylion1
Sorry, was just going through Mike's TL (we've never interacted before) and you got caught in a drive-by rat-posting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You two should get along great... check out his recent 3-parter on ribbonfarm
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.