Why is it framed that there are too many PhDs, and not that there isn't enough funding for research, art, etc.?https://twitter.com/bopinion/status/1346104350993768448 …
-
-
Replying to @NickPinkston
Because most PhDs are crap and would do nothing worthwhile even if funded to unlimited levels. There is no need to flatter the conceits of this crowd. 90% of them have far too high an opinion of themselves. I say this as one of the median ones from a “top” school.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Yea, I hear that. I never went beyond my bachelors for the same reason, but maybe that's just an argument to make better PhDs/schools? Certainly there's important humanities work to be done during a massive cultural / political shift, and little progress is being made.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickPinkston
I think the PhD is an obsolete mechanism. "Important" is doing a lot of work there. Even in STEM where the case is easier to make objectively ("cure cancer! solve climate!") it is dangerous to let self-absorbed people decide what is "important" on the public dime.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr @NickPinkston
I wonder what would happen if all advanced degrees in STEM were free.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Probably good things at micro-level so long as the entrance and exit criteria are relatively stringent and time-bound. But possibly bad things macro-level relating to funding. Free advanced-ed = fat state = cronyist corruption/planned economy crap.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.