Conversation

Replying to
By contrast Solutionist energy fields (like say the old economy one centered in New York)... boy do they come with strings attached. There are enforcers and gatekeepers and tastemakers and such at every bloody turn. This energy will destroy your soul if you draw on it too long.
2
6
Fall in line and produce by their recipes, they’ll love you. Violate any of a thousand subtle production norms, and they’ll turn on you. If you’re incompetent they’ll simply ignore you. If you violate their tastes but draw attention they claim, they will try to cut you down. Etc.
1
7
So in the absence of big solutionist energy fields, I strongly recommend you wander off into the desert on your own, without whatever energy source you can strap onto your back. If you accept problemist energy bargains you’ll likely regret it.
1
12
Energy in this sense is some mix of inspiration, energizing ideological commitments etc. But money is a pretty good proxy for it. If you’re a cultural producer, your money source is a pretty good proxy for your energy. So be careful and discerning in whose money you take.
3
18
Solutionist energy sources = laissez-faire cultural economy that can fail by producing tone-deaf smarmy cringe Problemist energy sources = cultural command economy that can fail by producing overwrought incestuous taste-swamp slime IMO It is easier to do good work in the former
1
11
Diffuse energy landscapes requiring self-contained energy sources... they can fail by being too self-absorbed and inscrutably idiosyncratic. Think mediocre autodidact tomes nobody reads or precious and self-important indie films nobody watches.
1
12
This is the great risk of the inward-turned domestic cozy place we’re in now. It’s going to be so easy and tempting to withdraw from broader cultural landscapes altogether and focus on “what sparks joy” a lot of people are going to do just that, and spend years producing dreck.
2
19
Staying plugged in beyond domestic walls will be fairly painful and energy-draining in the next decade, but if you can do it, it’ll be like buying into a cultural options lottery. You’ll have a shot at doing something that finds a place in a 2020s New Lost Generation canon.
2
16
To bring it back around to my own writing, despite a weird second wind for the Gervais principle, riding a second wind for The Office, I think 80% my old writing is no longer relevant. It’s too 2010s. I was aiming for “timeless” at the time, but turns out there’s no such thing.
2
13
Replying to
Why 80%? I guess a lot of processes, patterns, psychology etc remain the same, even if the 'cultural mix' ratio changed a lot. Do you feel it's 80% only because the broad narrative is no longer relevant, or you think there are some fundamentally new constituents?
1