Conversation

Replying to
So to be unspiritual is to be *only* sensitive to systematized realities. This is an alt-definition of “clueless.”
2
44
A key mistake is to conflate unsystematized with pre-systematic. The original sin of high modernism is to see the unsystematized as only a starting point of a singular future system. The un-pre gap is where illegibility lives. If you can’t sense the gap, you’re locally clueless.
1
26
Contempt is when you can sense the gap but are indifferent to it. Hostility is when you can sense it but feel a reactionary urge to reject it. You’re angry because you wish you were clueless enough to not respond to it.
2
13
I’d say intuition is instrumentalized spirituality. It senses through a lens of actionability. Fingerspitzengehful.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
The first word for "sensitivity to unsystematised realities" that comes to my mind is 'intuition', not 'spirituality' - an intuitive person is in touch with unsystematised realities. This may overlap with spirituality in the population but doesn't seem like the same thing. WDYT?
1
20
Replying to
In my experience the realm of the spirit and that which i define as “spirituality” is the primary origin of all systematisation and is conversely the absolute divine system; the supreme order. That which all man made systems attempt to emulate yet always fall short of.
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
The first word for "sensitivity to unsystematised realities" that comes to my mind is 'intuition', not 'spirituality' - an intuitive person is in touch with unsystematised realities. This may overlap with spirituality in the population but doesn't seem like the same thing. WDYT?
5
Replying to
I see religion as a way to systematize illegible realities. But then spirituality can be an unsystematized way of making sense of them Anyway better than negating illegible realities
1