In a way it was a supernova that exploded. The heavy elements are streaming across the world. What’s left behind is a very pretty nebula and a rapidly spinning neutron star. Still interesting to engage in other ways, but no longer the most vital source of writing-energy around.
-
-
Fall in line and produce by their recipes, they’ll love you. Violate any of a thousand subtle production norms, and they’ll turn on you. If you’re incompetent they’ll simply ignore you. If you violate their tastes but draw attention they claim, they will try to cut you down. Etc.
Show this thread -
So in the absence of big solutionist energy fields, I strongly recommend you wander off into the desert on your own, without whatever energy source you can strap onto your back. If you accept problemist energy bargains you’ll likely regret it.
Show this thread -
Energy in this sense is some mix of inspiration, energizing ideological commitments etc. But money is a pretty good proxy for it. If you’re a cultural producer, your money source is a pretty good proxy for your energy. So be careful and discerning in whose money you take.
Show this thread -
Solutionist energy sources = laissez-faire cultural economy that can fail by producing tone-deaf smarmy cringe Problemist energy sources = cultural command economy that can fail by producing overwrought incestuous taste-swamp slime IMO It is easier to do good work in the former
Show this thread -
Diffuse energy landscapes requiring self-contained energy sources... they can fail by being too self-absorbed and inscrutably idiosyncratic. Think mediocre autodidact tomes nobody reads or precious and self-important indie films nobody watches.
Show this thread -
This is the great risk of the inward-turned domestic cozy place we’re in now. It’s going to be so easy and tempting to withdraw from broader cultural landscapes altogether and focus on “what sparks joy” a lot of people are going to do just that, and spend years producing dreck.
Show this thread -
Staying plugged in beyond domestic walls will be fairly painful and energy-draining in the next decade, but if you can do it, it’ll be like buying into a cultural options lottery. You’ll have a shot at doing something that finds a place in a 2020s New Lost Generation canon.
Show this thread -
To bring it back around to my own writing, despite a weird second wind for the Gervais principle, riding a second wind for The Office, I think 80% my old writing is no longer relevant. It’s too 2010s. I was aiming for “timeless” at the time, but turns out there’s no such thing.
Show this thread -
Time, as it turns out, is too deeply woven into the fabric of reality for anything to escape it. At best you can hope for something to be periodically fashionable again, or worth resurrecting/transposing to new keys for new times. A classic is just a historical-seasonal fashion.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You meant Problemist... SV had a paradigm (no scare quotes) shift when MS stopped planning to win the mobile war. All software (tasting, eating and digesting) of the world the last five decades is Enterprise driven, which MS owned by the desktops. 1/k
-
80% of the ML (scare quotes warranted) mantras the last decade is gleaning and chanting things which Windows already knew. Apple/Jobs certainly did the heavy lift to take computing out of the MS orbit. 2/k
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.