If you write fiction, you have to choose names for characters and places even if they are not critical to the story. If you do engineering, you have to choose names for variables, and details like shaft diameters even if specific bindings don’t matter. Therein lies a rhyme.
Makes sense. It’s a very tricky thing. I’d probably call it realityistic rather than realistic. Complexity comparable to reality and equivalently satisfying but not necessarily realistic.
-
-
Yeah. That’s very close to where Barthes is. He doesn’t think this inessential detail brings a text closer to actual reality. He just thinks it’s what makes readers refer to it as “realistic”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.