LA is going to be a disaster area by the end of January. This slow-motion train wreck.https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-28/why-covid-19-cases-have-spread-wildly-in-l-a …
-
Show this thread
-
The chain of causation from healthy individual decisions far from the crisis (“I’m healthy, our one party can’t hurt”) to icu bed-rationing (“2 dying patients, 1 bed, who to save?”) is invisible except as a mental model. There’s a type of person who can’t believe it is real.
5 replies 22 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
Heard another ambulance as I was writing the last tweet. In some ways, I imagine watching bombs rain down in a war would be more scary but more real. No powers of abstraction or statistical reasoning necessary to “see” what’s going on.
2 replies 4 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
The missing dimension in war comparisons is the link between individual courage and risk to others. If bombs or bullets are raining down, and you wander into the middle of it because you’re “not a pussy” only you get killed. Imagine if bombs or bullets worked like viruses.
1 reply 4 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
You’d get hit by a bomb shock wave or piece of shrapnel or a bullet but not know it for 4-14 days. And in the meantime, everywhere you went you’d be dropping little bombs or shooting bullets at others... and they wouldn’t know.
3 replies 3 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
The word “trace” as in contact tracing is interesting. Bullets have their own form of “contact tracing” ... tracer bullets were invented in 1915 to allow machine gunners to see their line of fire (and the people getting shot at could see it too). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracer_ammunition …
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Phone contact tracing is a cool technology but I wish there was something visceral or visual like tracer bullets. Like if you went to the grocery store, your nose would glow red for 4-14 days.
2 replies 2 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
It’s easy to suspect stupidity, but anecdotally many who under-react seem to be actually pretty smart have some mix of Darwinian-karmic fatalism, and extra distrust of purveyors of abstraction-binding data. Actual difficulty with abstract reasoning seems to be a minor factor.
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
It is possible for a certain kind of smart person to believe: 1. ICUs are overwhelmed 2. Letting old/obese etc die off is kinda okay 3. Official upstream statistics are sketchy 4. Benefit of modeling doubt should go to me (attribution error) 5. Secret, unfair agendas are at work
1 reply 4 retweets 28 likesShow this thread
Once a binary fair/unfair legit/cheating frame has kicked in, it’s game over. Sure there’s going to be some (for eg) suboptimal/captured vaccine distribution, but it makes a difference if you process it as part of routine execution chaos or a test for deciding cooperate/defect.
-
-
The descent to a tragedy of the commons hell is paved with cheater detection.
5 replies 11 retweets 54 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @vgr
mistake theory vs conflict theory right there in the cheating/legit frame
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.