"Financialization" is about 50% evil shit done by people with operating under severe moral hazard, and 50% legit effects of where value actually lives in a complex globalized industry. It is NOT distributed in proportion to the atoms making up the physical "plant" of the thing
-
Show this thread
-
Like the bulk of the value of Apple right now is probably in the designs of M1/A13 chips and CAD files for say a half-dozen key physical devices that would fit on a small rack of servers at most. Not counting value in people's heads, which Apple can't claim. The rest is filler.
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
The diff between Apple and seemingly more physical businesses like McDonalds etc. is one of degree, not kind. The real estate and physical WIP stocks account for only a small value of the companies, and most of the financial bombing damage happens in the information structure.
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Even heavy manufacturing... Tesla's Fremont factory was an old GM/Toyota joint venture factory. The new operator of the facility is financially worth way more than the old ones. It's all in the financial architecture and software now.
1 reply 2 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
The "commodity atom" fraction value of all businesses is headed straight to zero. Almost all the value will be in a) software b) financial architecture. a) is vulnerable to viruses, malware, hacks etc. b) is vulnerable to financial disasters.
3 replies 2 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
I've used private industry examples, but the same thing applies to public agencies (EPA, FBI, State Department...) that have been relentlessly bombed by Trump for 4 years. And now city/state orgs that are being thrown under the bus with new stimulus bill.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Socialists get mad because they *wish* valuation worked differently: start with uniquely high and fixed valuation of each human being, then value all the capital assets in proportion to proximity to the human element in the system, since that's what makes for stable human lives.
3 replies 2 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
By this logic, McDonald's should be valued as follows:
$X per employee, then$Y for the value of the equipment and furniture etc. in the branches the humans work in, etc. etc. Automated, distant things would be worth $0, as would any cloudy automated software.1 reply 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Humans out of sight in hinterland feedlot operations for beef raising would be worth less than restaurant service workers with faces, names, badges. And people in other countries would be worth even less. Nowhere in this socialist valuation is the logic of the org factored in
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It’s the socialist unconscious that the explicit ideology can’t see
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @b_cavello @vgr
Yes, a lot of economic thinking is implicitly assuming the economy occurs at a single well-mixed point location. When the distances or delays become significant the complexity goes up a lot. Normally politics is more geographical, but often uses nonlocal economic thinking.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.