I have pretty good instincts around how organizations are managed and how they do/should do their actual work (like airports running airline ops), but I have a big blindspot when it comes to understanding the financial engineering structure of the world
Conversation
every org/institution in the world has a financial shape/size based on its funding sources, capital reserves, debt on the books, stock or bond instruments modeling ownership, etc. The landscape of these shapes and sizes has been simply blown up catastrophically
1
3
46
when I was younger and more naive, I'd ask dumb questions like why, when there is no material damage, and when the financial stuff is essentially arbitrary fiat fictions, you couldn't just "fix" the shape/size of an org in financial terms after a blindside catastrophe
2
3
27
it feels weird to see perfectly fine undamaged capital assets like buildings and equipment undergoing the financial equivalent of being rained on with bombs
1
1
37
But this is a dumb way to look at it. A better way to think of it is like this: the financial architecture of an organization is very much like the software architecture on a hardware device. Most of the value is in that intangible architecture in either case.
1
4
47
Without s/w that can run on it, a hardware device like an iPhone is worth no more than its weight in physical raw materials -- some aluminum and sand and copper basically. It's worth like maybe $10 in raw materials. This is why open/unlocked/non-proprietary is such a big deal.
1
3
38
Financial architecture is like that for institutions. It may seem like an impressive building full of nice standing desks and multi-monitor workstations and aeron chairs etc is "undamaged" by a financial crisis, but if you added up all the value, I bet it would be minimal.
3
1
32
Like, even the fanciest business that is primarily information/culture based, I suspect the material value of the atoms would not exceed say 10-15% of the value of the institution, and the bulk of it would probably be real estate/lease value, not furniture etc.
3
2
26
Even something like a modern restaurant is primarily a financial beast, not a physical beast. McDonald's is financial software running on real estate, with the actual capital backing it in heartland feedlots and flour mills.
2
2
45
"Financialization" is about 50% evil shit done by people with operating under severe moral hazard, and 50% legit effects of where value actually lives in a complex globalized industry. It is NOT distributed in proportion to the atoms making up the physical "plant" of the thing
2
6
47
Replying to
The diff between Apple and seemingly more physical businesses like McDonalds etc. is one of degree, not kind. The real estate and physical WIP stocks account for only a small value of the companies, and most of the financial bombing damage happens in the information structure.
2
3
24
Even heavy manufacturing... Tesla's Fremont factory was an old GM/Toyota joint venture factory. The new operator of the facility is financially worth way more than the old ones. It's all in the financial architecture and software now.
1
3
25
The "commodity atom" fraction value of all businesses is headed straight to zero. Almost all the value will be in a) software b) financial architecture. a) is vulnerable to viruses, malware, hacks etc. b) is vulnerable to financial disasters.
3
5
28
I've used private industry examples, but the same thing applies to public agencies (EPA, FBI, State Department...) that have been relentlessly bombed by Trump for 4 years. And now city/state orgs that are being thrown under the bus with new stimulus bill.
1
19
Socialists get mad because they *wish* valuation worked differently: start with uniquely high and fixed valuation of each human being, then value all the capital assets in proportion to proximity to the human element in the system, since that's what makes for stable human lives.
3
3
28
Humans out of sight in hinterland feedlot operations for beef raising would be worth less than restaurant service workers with faces, names, badges. And people in other countries would be worth even less.
Nowhere in this socialist valuation is the logic of the org factored in
2
1
20
By which I mean -- valuing an org based on how it creates value, which means mapping structure of technology use, intellectual property production and obsolescence, info flows, and so on. Financial architecture is about an uneasy mix of factoring in both kinds of valuation.
1
1
17
"Culture eats strategy for lunch" is pure wishful thinking. It is the belief that the system works for the humans that are part of it, and that those humans are self-evidently the most valuable part of the system. This is unfortunately simply not true. It's just nice to have.
2
3
40
It feels like the noble humanist thing to do to come up with a human-centric valuation and calculus for the nature of things, but that's... not how the world works. Things have a nature of their own. You may ignore that nature, but it won't ignore you.
3
3
28
Covid is ultimately a huge shock to the last bastion of anthropocentric conceit -- that the way the artificial, human-built work somehow revolves around the humans in it. No it does not, and there's no known way to make it work in a way that does at the scale of 8b humans.
1
7
37
I am deeply suspicious of "human-centric" anything because the phrase is anthropocentric conceit wrapped in humanist-values posturing. It leads to the deepest sorts of inhumanity to NOT acknowledge when emergent systems have reached escape velocity from human-centeredness
2
11
65
There is a deep sort of self-absorbed arrogance to acting like it's self-evidently true that large, globe-spanning complex systems should somehow revolve around the humans you see closest to you and care about.
1
3
43
The result is a spectrum of different flavors of human-centric bullshit that leads to completely whacko shape/size of even non-corrupt attempts at responding financially to crises. No matter who is in charge, so long as they think in human-centric ways, they get it wrong.
1
1
20
Idiots on the left want free money rain. Idiots on the right want to sermonize about "personal responsibility." Idiots on the top want to gleefully hand money to each other imagining cronyism is sustainable in a vacuum. Idiots on the bottom want to burn everything down.
2
15
62
Every one of these responses fails through human-centricity. The machine/set of machines must first be in working order creating a surplus in parameter space to allow you to center human concerns.
1
3
32
This is one reason I detest the techlash, despite some justice in their criticisms of tech. The techlash is a bad-faith worldview rooted in a willful ignorance of how the world works, and an arrogant presumption that of course it should work in a human-centric way.
2
1
36
Sometimes I think we need a proper new religion based on unironically and genuinely sacralizing "tech." It is insane that we think people who uncritically worship rocket launches are somehow lesser humans than ones who worship mythical memories of long-ago fake news pseudoevents.
1
4
29
Even if you understand nothing about a thing, worship is a way of centering it and ridding yourself of the assumption that you are at the center when you are not. That's epistemic progress. Even if your mental model of the thing you're centering is completely wrong and childish.
1
4
29
Even if you think rockets work on the principle of dragons hidden in the fuselage breathing fire out the bottom, that's better, tbh, than thinking the world was created in 7 days in 6000 BC by some dude with a white beard who still interferes with "miracles" to guide events.
2
16
Yet, which belief gets ridiculed, and which ones gets deeply centered in everything from the social calendar to tax policy to social-distancing exemption policy? Merry covid-spreading Christmas.
1
2
22
I'm not saying ignore human concerns and save the system. I'm saying don't forget that the option of paying attention to human concerns only exists if you pay adequate attention to the workings of world machinery first.
1
7
35
The world today is in a financially bombed out state. If balance sheets and budgets were buildings, it would look like Dresden or Tokyo after the firebombing attacks. Utter gutting and devastation of large sections of the financial built environment.
1
2
20
We don't see this because we never admitted to ourselves that the way the world works, the financial software is in fact the center. We tagged it the preserve of sociopaths, and guess what, system adversely selected precisely the people who had no problems being viewed as such.
2
4
45
Our world works as well as it does, feeding and provisioning 7.8B people with food, water, antibiotics, vaccines, smartphones, roads, transportation, etc. because it does NOT center humans the way a small 30-person hunter-gatherercommunity did when world-pop was 100,000.
2
2
27
The only way to be human at this scale and complexity of civilization is to realize that humans are not the center. Merely the privileged beneficiary of the system being somewhere close to working order.
2
2
32
We are all Eloi living on the surface of the leviathan pretending that what we care about in our little lives is what matters for the whole to work -- family, music, jokes, twitter, etc. The small minority who center a search for the actual soul of the beast get tagged villains.
1
1
32
Yes, there are venal elites, corrupt patterns, oppression, and all that, but all that is STILL human centric. It is peripheral to the way the machine works the way first class vs. coach and legroom issues are peripheral to how an airplane flies at all.
2
2
22
I think trying to make things human-centric and focusing on ideological blame games is the Original Sin of systems thinking. It's as silly as trying to make the solar system geocentric by force. The center is where the center is.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Seems like you bristle at the bad-faith arguments on all sides, do you resent the search for alternatives to ‘greed is good’ & obvious lies of the global capitalist bourgeoise? More Foucault than Marx, aren’t we supposed to make things more human-centric? question our systems?
2
6
28
The human imperative is to always be seeking new ways to decenter ourselves, shed more layers of our anthropocentric conceits, and try harder to discover the true centers of things that concern us.
3
1
22
Show replies

