I have pretty good instincts around how organizations are managed and how they do/should do their actual work (like airports running airline ops), but I have a big blindspot when it comes to understanding the financial engineering structure of the world
-
-
The diff between Apple and seemingly more physical businesses like McDonalds etc. is one of degree, not kind. The real estate and physical WIP stocks account for only a small value of the companies, and most of the financial bombing damage happens in the information structure.
Show this thread -
Even heavy manufacturing... Tesla's Fremont factory was an old GM/Toyota joint venture factory. The new operator of the facility is financially worth way more than the old ones. It's all in the financial architecture and software now.
Show this thread -
The "commodity atom" fraction value of all businesses is headed straight to zero. Almost all the value will be in a) software b) financial architecture. a) is vulnerable to viruses, malware, hacks etc. b) is vulnerable to financial disasters.
Show this thread -
I've used private industry examples, but the same thing applies to public agencies (EPA, FBI, State Department...) that have been relentlessly bombed by Trump for 4 years. And now city/state orgs that are being thrown under the bus with new stimulus bill.
Show this thread -
Socialists get mad because they *wish* valuation worked differently: start with uniquely high and fixed valuation of each human being, then value all the capital assets in proportion to proximity to the human element in the system, since that's what makes for stable human lives.
Show this thread -
Humans out of sight in hinterland feedlot operations for beef raising would be worth less than restaurant service workers with faces, names, badges. And people in other countries would be worth even less. Nowhere in this socialist valuation is the logic of the org factored in
Show this thread -
By which I mean -- valuing an org based on how it creates value, which means mapping structure of technology use, intellectual property production and obsolescence, info flows, and so on. Financial architecture is about an uneasy mix of factoring in both kinds of valuation.
Show this thread -
"Culture eats strategy for lunch" is pure wishful thinking. It is the belief that the system works for the humans that are part of it, and that those humans are self-evidently the most valuable part of the system. This is unfortunately simply not true. It's just nice to have.
Show this thread -
It feels like the noble humanist thing to do to come up with a human-centric valuation and calculus for the nature of things, but that's... not how the world works. Things have a nature of their own. You may ignore that nature, but it won't ignore you.
Show this thread -
Covid is ultimately a huge shock to the last bastion of anthropocentric conceit -- that the way the artificial, human-built work somehow revolves around the humans in it. No it does not, and there's no known way to make it work in a way that does at the scale of 8b humans.
Show this thread -
I am deeply suspicious of "human-centric" anything because the phrase is anthropocentric conceit wrapped in humanist-values posturing. It leads to the deepest sorts of inhumanity to NOT acknowledge when emergent systems have reached escape velocity from human-centeredness
Show this thread -
There is a deep sort of self-absorbed arrogance to acting like it's self-evidently true that large, globe-spanning complex systems should somehow revolve around the humans you see closest to you and care about.
Show this thread -
The result is a spectrum of different flavors of human-centric bullshit that leads to completely whacko shape/size of even non-corrupt attempts at responding financially to crises. No matter who is in charge, so long as they think in human-centric ways, they get it wrong.
Show this thread -
Idiots on the left want free money rain. Idiots on the right want to sermonize about "personal responsibility." Idiots on the top want to gleefully hand money to each other imagining cronyism is sustainable in a vacuum. Idiots on the bottom want to burn everything down.
Show this thread -
Every one of these responses fails through human-centricity. The machine/set of machines must first be in working order creating a surplus in parameter space to allow you to center human concerns.
Show this thread -
This is one reason I detest the techlash, despite some justice in their criticisms of tech. The techlash is a bad-faith worldview rooted in a willful ignorance of how the world works, and an arrogant presumption that of course it should work in a human-centric way.
Show this thread -
Sometimes I think we need a proper new religion based on unironically and genuinely sacralizing "tech." It is insane that we think people who uncritically worship rocket launches are somehow lesser humans than ones who worship mythical memories of long-ago fake news pseudoevents.
Show this thread -
Even if you understand nothing about a thing, worship is a way of centering it and ridding yourself of the assumption that you are at the center when you are not. That's epistemic progress. Even if your mental model of the thing you're centering is completely wrong and childish.
Show this thread -
Even if you think rockets work on the principle of dragons hidden in the fuselage breathing fire out the bottom, that's better, tbh, than thinking the world was created in 7 days in 6000 BC by some dude with a white beard who still interferes with "miracles" to guide events.
Show this thread -
Yet, which belief gets ridiculed, and which ones gets deeply centered in everything from the social calendar to tax policy to social-distancing exemption policy? Merry covid-spreading Christmas.
Show this thread -
I'm not saying ignore human concerns and save the system. I'm saying don't forget that the option of paying attention to human concerns only exists if you pay adequate attention to the workings of world machinery first.
Show this thread -
The world today is in a financially bombed out state. If balance sheets and budgets were buildings, it would look like Dresden or Tokyo after the firebombing attacks. Utter gutting and devastation of large sections of the financial built environment.
Show this thread -
We don't see this because we never admitted to ourselves that the way the world works, the financial software is in fact the center. We tagged it the preserve of sociopaths, and guess what, system adversely selected precisely the people who had no problems being viewed as such.
Show this thread -
Our world works as well as it does, feeding and provisioning 7.8B people with food, water, antibiotics, vaccines, smartphones, roads, transportation, etc. because it does NOT center humans the way a small 30-person hunter-gatherercommunity did when world-pop was 100,000.
Show this thread -
The only way to be human at this scale and complexity of civilization is to realize that humans are not the center. Merely the privileged beneficiary of the system being somewhere close to working order.
Show this thread -
We are all Eloi living on the surface of the leviathan pretending that what we care about in our little lives is what matters for the whole to work -- family, music, jokes, twitter, etc. The small minority who center a search for the actual soul of the beast get tagged villains.
Show this thread -
Yes, there are venal elites, corrupt patterns, oppression, and all that, but all that is STILL human centric. It is peripheral to the way the machine works the way first class vs. coach and legroom issues are peripheral to how an airplane flies at all.
Show this thread -
I think trying to make things human-centric and focusing on ideological blame games is the Original Sin of systems thinking. It's as silly as trying to make the solar system geocentric by force. The center is where the center is.https://twitter.com/royking3/status/1341116110498713600 …
Show this thread -
The human imperative is to always be seeking new ways to decenter ourselves, shed more layers of our anthropocentric conceits, and try harder to discover the true centers of things that concern us.
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.