Conversation

AI personhood would be nice, but is a sideshow. What we need is data model personhood. Which is kinda the same as instrumentation personhood, since data doesn’t exist until it is measured, and measurements don’t exist without data models derived from instrument models
3
32
Example: say a digital home thermometer samples temperature at 100hz via a thermistor. That’s ~80 MB of data a day that rests on the meanings of terms like “Celsius” and “byte”, a sensor curve, etc. Collectively that conceptual model of data is embodied by a long list of numbers.
3
5
It’s useful to think of that column of 86,400,000 numbers plus some meta-information is a virtual person attached to the physical device. The richer and more varied the data, the more it needs to be digested and summarized in reified models to be legible at all.
2
5
Past a point of complexity, the data has to speak for itself via bundled analytics etc. It has to make choices about how to present itself at high level. A stream of data turns into a system’s narrative memory of itself and then data turns into Data.
Data Star Trek GIF
GIF
2
10
This may seem silly for a thermometer producing a one-dimensional stream of numbers whose meaning is based on stable physics models, but just peek into say climate data debates around temperature records and you’ll realize how fraught this is... personhood is a way to model that.
In Culture novels, people routinely save entire states of themselves, including memories, that can be used to resurrect them in cloned bodies or as AIs. Im skeptical of “uploading” as a sentience/consciousness preserving process, but the data-agency take on that is a weaker claim
2
6
The question then is: who owns data-persons created from your data? You the source of the data? The owners of the instrumentation IP? The owners of the copyright on the data model used to cast physical signals like a current valuation into data?
2
5
I think the only solution is: the data owns itself. Just like biological offspring do. Anything else leads to an unholy mess of conflicts of interest, bad faith, etc.
1
6
Like children, data persons need parenting until they get “grow up.” But the principle of fostering ontogenic development into full personhood should be the true north. Ideas like “researchers should open-source data and code used to write peer-reviewed papers” are soft versions.
1
4
I’m not a data-rights absolutist, and am willing to trade “my” data for services, but the farther data is along ontogenic path to personhood, the more wary I am of it being locked up. Not “information wants to be free” but “data shouldn’t be in school/jail without good reason”
Quote Tweet
Hey @whoop I’m enjoying your product a lot, but how do I get my data downloaded in some useful format like csv or json or via api/zapier/ifttt? There’s no documentation that I can find or plans/announcements. It’s almost 2021! Weird to see a consumer health data walled garden.
Show this thread
1
8
Thomas Nagle, 1974: What is it like to be a bat? Me, 2020: How fo you know you’re not a lichen? A data-ghost of 3 or more beings that just thinks it’s one person 🤣
1
13