Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
vgr's profile
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
Venkatesh Rao
@vgr

Tweets

Venkatesh Rao

@vgr

Conversational account. For work follow @ribbonfarm, @breaking_smart, @artofgig. Tweets are 90% vacuous views, apathetically held. Mediocritopian. IKEA builder.

Los Angeles, CA
venkateshrao.com
Joined August 2007

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      If a “good” system rests on the presumption of frontline judgment and authority in exceptional cases, and government is staffed by average types, you’re out of luck. They’ll invariably screw up enough that system will drift towards either way more or way less governance.

      2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      This is nearly synonymous with more surveillance in *both* cases. The only question is by whom. Superstates (China), Supercorps (Google) or the Worst Nosy Neighbors (neighborhood apps). I suspect a balance of power among the 3 could work. Problem is third leg of stool is too weak

      1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      What does *not* work well is no surveillance at all. Covid has shown that unfortunately there’s a hard tradeoff between mutual surveillance and staying alive. Maybe there’s a secure cryptography way of having cake and eating it too. If so, I haven’t heard of it.

      2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      I think the dream of privacy absolutists is true opt-in, which requires an ungoverned space to exit to, where I cannot pry, but you cannot send covid my way either. So... a quarantine exit island where people accept high death rate for low surveillance.

      2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The US of course has managed to become the worst of both worlds: a fairly strong surveillance state that cannot actually keep you safe. But still requires you to file Form 22 on time on pain of penalties, and they can find you well enough to fine or jail you.

      2 replies 6 retweets 31 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      India is the same way. The oldest and largest democracies take gold and silver in the Covid-case-count Olympics. Not an accident. I’m currently struggling to not be in violation of some dumb-ass need-a-number regulations in both countries that are under Covid-distress.

      2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Everybody talks about how Covid has broken the economy. It hasn’t really. What it has broken is government. The economic stuff is symptoms. I think we’re only just beginning to realize his badly Covid has broken government. We still gave a functional economy. But not governance.

      1 reply 6 retweets 26 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Covid exposed the fragility of government by open-loop unaccountable processes and disempowered bureaucrats that is in the process of being half-ass eaten by software without adequate attention to its exception-handling nature. Under a stressor like Covid the scheme has blown up.

      1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Congrats Steve Bannon, Covid has done what you tried and failed to do. Dismantle the administrative state. The thing *looks* like it’s holding together but has actually fallen apart more than anyone has admitted.

      3 replies 1 retweet 21 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      Continuing this train of thought, I'm beginning to suspect a software-eaten world is ungovernable. There may be no such thing as government 2.0, which means politics 2.0 will rest directly on community rather than institutions. ie pure gemeinschaft, little to no gesellschaft.

      1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
      Show this thread
      Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The thing is, the private sector has a *natural* meritocratic mode. The talented people go build stuff designed for the mediocre people, there is potential for genuine opt-in and exit/voice choices in consumption, everybody wins so long as there's no must-have monopoly.

      10:56 AM - 8 Dec 2020
      • 3 Likes
      • Wheeler ☘️🎃
      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          It would be hard, but you *could* in principle live without dealing with Google, Amazon, Facebook etc. without breaking any laws. Life would just suck by my standards, and you might have to forgo many things, but maybe you'd enjoy it.

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Weirdly enough, despite all the talk of monopolies, the phone companies are still a sort of oligopoly that's a defacto monopoly because you do need a phone number for too many practical things. It would actually be hard to live a legal life without a phone number.

          1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          It is no surprise that countries (often leapfrogging developing countries) build their e-governance on phones, not email addresses or web access. It is now increasingly unbelievably hard to conduct life in India without an aadhar number and phone number.

          2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In the US, in theory, all you need is an SSN to be a street-legal human being. You don't even need a driver's license. Technically you don't need a phone number either, though practically you do.

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In India, for decades, the primary identity document was the ration card, used for public distribution of commodities like rice, sugar, kerosine. Not the birth certificate (too few people born in hospitals etc) or driver's license (only a tiny fraction drive powered vehicles).

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        7. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          I strongly suspect one enabling factor in the current farmers-vs-government standoff in India is that the identity system has shifted from the ration card (which rested indirectly on ag subsidies and price supports for public distribution via ration cards) to the aadhar system.

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          As a kid I remember trips to the "ration shop" with my dad. A dreary, soviet-dystopian little government office, for sugar and kerosine (for emergency lamp oil use due to frequent blackouts), the only commodities we bought from the PDS.

          1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Everything else we bought on the private market like most middle class. Truth be told, we didn't need the ration card except for identity. And importantly it was a family/household-level identity document. I suspect, the PDS was propped up by the need for an identity system.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Some satirist (possibly Khushwant Singh) once described the ration card as a "document with the ominously permanent look of a driver's license." In my time it was this blue cloth-bound thick paper ledger like thing where you tracked your allotments of sugar, kerosine etc.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In the US, "social security" plays the same role. It's a benefits scheme that's morphed into an identity scheme. This tells you something about how governments work -- all compliance with identity-linked government dealings must be linked to a big government carrot.

          1 reply 3 retweets 16 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          The thing about schemes like aadhar is that it is a high-modernist "view from nowhere" of citizenry that isn't linked to any specific aspect of citizenship but is all consuming and encompassing.

          1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In the wake of Covid, I am guessing some governments will link access to any state benefits to proof of vaccination or something. Things could get ugly. When the state mainly represents a stick rather than a carrot, people wonder why the state exists.

          1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          This has been a meandering, discursive thread that's a subtweet of 2 big national governments (and 1 big state government) due to some shit I'm dealing with, but let me try distilling a tldr out of this for why I think something big has broken in government and statecraft.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Government is viable when there is a big enough carrot with which to induce consent of governance by a monopolistic scheme from which there is no opting out, and enough people opt-in even though there is no choice not to. Government rests on people choosing from a set of 1.

          1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes
          Show this thread
        16. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In theory, we have consent of the governed and any sort of governance at all because there are collective problems that we think are solved poorly or not at all by private actors. Like pandemic control. **This is the whole reason we agree to being governed at all.**

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
          Show this thread
        17. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          In practice though, we have consent of the governed because the collective action problems that actually need governance as the unique solution are rare enough that instead we do a softer consent around entitlements that are not actually governance problems.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        18. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Ie, let's say that perhaps markets would do better on almost everything, including pricing and distributing ag commodities in India, and securing retirement incomes in the US. There's almost nothing the state *must* to do except a) provide security b) wage wars b) stop pandemics

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        19. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          So why can't we do with just a minimalist night-watchman/night-nurse state that only does those things and leaves the rest alone? Because a state capable of doing those 3 things is by definition big enough to require constant justification and operational use with other duties.

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        20. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          ie if you have a government capable enough to deal with a once-in-a-century pandemic, the kind of problem it is meant for, it has to be given things to do for the other 99 years

          2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
          Show this thread
        21. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          But we only put up with inefficiency of the state doing things like food distribution in the 99 years because we expect it to actually work as designed if there is a problem like a pandemic. If a state fails a pandemic test (or a hot war test, or a real law-and-order test)...??

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
          Show this thread
        22. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          It's an existential crisis. People start wondering: "You had one job...everything else is merely to keep you busy when that job isn't required of you... so if you fail the one job, why are we giving you all the other jobs?"

          1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
          Show this thread
        23. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          I'm only concerned with big countries here. The problem is, with respect, simply not that big or hard in small countries. So Covid response is meaningfully comparable across say the US, India, China, the EU (to the extent it is a single zone) etc.

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
          Show this thread
        24. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Kudos to New Zealand, Taiwan etc. But the lessons I am interested in are mainly US+EU+BRIC. China represents one solution. The state did its One Job. Chinese people have to now decide whether it's worth the other costs of being ruled by the CCP means. I still wouldn't tbh.

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
          Show this thread
        25. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          The US has failed its One Job. Americans now have to decide whether it's worth giving the state another shot with the next big crisis, or simply accept the costs of being ungoverned (aka, periodic culls and die-offs from a more Darwinian, ungoverned frontier ancap existence)

          1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
          Show this thread
        26. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Despite 284k deaths and Trump, yeah, I'd still choose to live in the US over China. I'll take my chances at securing my own health. As for the choice... , I'm inclined to give the state another shot at getting it right. Unfortunately I don't think most Americans are so inclined.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        27. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          This is pretty tough for me to admit. I like to think of myself as macro-compassionate and concerned for all life. But here I am admitting I'd rather give a derelict Trump-trashed state another chance on a pile of 284k bodies rather than be ruled by something like the CCP.

          2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        28. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          But like I said, most people won't be willing to give the state another chance. So choosing to take the vaccine will be partly a referendum on "does the state deserve another chance to get it right" (not perfect, since there's a lot more going into the decision to get vaccinated)

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        29. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Note that this is NOT a choice between "take the vaccine and risk side effects in order to save 100s of ks of lives" vs. "let people die, I'm healthy enough" It's a choice between "I trust the state to actually get the rest right if I make this pro-social choice to get vaccine"

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        30. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Like consider you're a healthy young person who thinks your covid risk is not that much higher than your vaccine side-effects risk, but you're pro-social and willing to take the shot anyway. Your real conundrum is: do you trust the state not to fuck everything else up?

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        31. Venkatesh Rao‏ @vgr Dec 8
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          We're not talking anti-vaxx crackpot or maga ideologue nut. We're talking a reasonable person. Such a person might think "the initial response disaster was mainly Trump, and if he's out, Biden deserves a chance at getting it right, so I'll take the vaccine"

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
          Show this thread
        32. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info