bibliography management is a dinosaur (bibtex, endnote) designed for dead-tree serialized documents... with online use bolted on as a bad afterthought (see footnotes in online docs for eg). Need an online-native model. The serialized print doc should be the afterthought.
-
-
Today, you'd want a fat/wrapped reference. The core text would be the same, but [1] would point to YOUR public note about the original text. It's like showing your source code. Show your "reading" of your source texts too.
Show this thread -
If it's a lazy ref where you didn't actually read it, but are citing it for political/social reasons (for eg. you expect the author to be a likely peer reviewer and want to flatter their conceit up front)... that's actually a social problem with peer review based production.
Show this thread -
Interestingly non-academic quasi-scholarly writing does not have this particular problem, though it has others. No kiss-ass citations. I hated those back when I was doing academic writing. I'm working on a whitepaper project now and it's refreshingly free of such imperatives.
Show this thread -
hey
@Conaw put "disrupt bibtex and endnote" on your to-do list for 2021Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe something like this helps, where the main findings of the cited paper are available as a popup, so you can check. This feature has been available in Scholarcy for a while now, although it's not used a great deal.pic.twitter.com/SCiM2ptqIR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.