Briefly, then decided it was mostly Wiener’s delusions of grandeur picked up by people who he could easily bullshit, adding very little to the basic engineering subject. Did have a paper in IEEE systems, cybernetics, and man journal though :)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KeenDisregard
Control theory is bread-and-butter engineering routinely used in everything from thermostats to autopilots to missile guidance. Dates to 1930s. Wiener made a few key early contributions in the 1940s and then forked off into a cult of personality pseudoscience ama cybernetics.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KeenDisregard
Yeah he’s one of the principals. It was really never more than a track of famous conferences and a few political enthusiasts. To get a sense of control theory browse the ToC of this standard undergrad text.https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Control-Engineering-Katsuhiko-Ogata/dp/0136156738 …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KeenDisregard
That’s a good example to see the differences. In control theory the statement is called the internal model principle and is used in actual design. Like to design a system that rejects a sinusoid disturbance you’d put an oscillator in. The cybernetics version is more a zen koan.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I just remembered I wrote a thing about it so I don’t have to rehash my critique
https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2019/07/17/weirding-diary-9/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.