Case that the polls are wrong again and nobody learned anything from 2016. After reading Nate Silver’s convoluted apologia for polling and then this I’ve decided this whole field should be declared illegal like cocaine politico.com/amp/news/magaz
Conversation
What’s the point of a fishy (heh!) number like 90% embedded in what’s basically a science fiction story? It’s basically not much better than “shields down to 60%” in Star Trek. Bayesians just add a backstory.


