One of my rules is to avoid preaching, except on rare occasions to the choir (I don’t get why that’s a bad thing... preaching is best restricted to those who’ve opted in). My attitude to Trumpies has always been: you make your choices, I make mine, we don’t have to be friends.
-
-
So this is the “be somebody or do something” moment for news media people. The title “journalist” means nothing. Writing (or audio/video broadcasting) for a brand-name outlet means nothing. You might still get “press pass” access to places I can’t but they’re worth nothing.
Show this thread -
If you still think you’re better than anyone else with a laptop, you’ll have to show it through what you do. You can no longer ride the cred of a distinguished class that in hindsight was distinguished only by unearned access to high capex Heidelberg presses and telecom equipment
Show this thread -
I sometimes wonder if I’m more moral than the average journalist
It’s not as academic as the comparison upthread to politicians. I have no interest in being a politician. But I’m clearly adjacent to news media. The main difference being unwillingness to do fieldwork.Show this thread -
Laziness has saved my soul, but... Under the incentives journalists operate under, would I succumb to clickbait? Access-journalism deals with the devil? Epstein-Weinstein enablement circuses? Fox-level mad-crowd-fu? Probably not tbh. I differ in ways besides laziness.
Show this thread -
I lack a certain sense of moral self-importance I think all journalists who consider themselves “good” seem to share. Something that infuses the pompous phrase “the public has a right to know.” A tendency towards public-interest inquisitorial self appointment.pic.twitter.com/ZNIuspKNDk
Show this thread -
I think “the public” is an ass, like the law, that I’m a part of it, and that it has no more right to anything than elites. The only reason the public doesn’t do self-dealing is that it lacks the opportunity and cunning. You get no halo from representing it.
Show this thread -
Self-appointing yourself to represent its interests doesn’t lend you any sort of halo. You’re basically no better than Trump spokespersons representing Trump’s right to not be held accountable. Or a neoliberal corporate shill like me representing corporations right to profit
Show this thread -
Another thing I wonder is: when everything across the board has been going to hell, why has news media been going there double quick? Is it because Trump has been attacking and undermining them with extra vigor as the Red Resentment Revenge Emissary in Chief? No, that’s too easy
Show this thread -
I think it’s because they’ve been the only institution truly above judgment and accountability so far. To the point it took a populist near-coup to make them even notice there were issues beyond the internet eating their lavish 3-martini lunch.
Show this thread -
While most of my own personal interactions with journalists have been positive, a few times yeah... the sense of being judged by a priest themselves above judgment. And unaware of their own distinct lack of saintliness.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
.
He’s been as much part of the problem as anyone. Media people pointing fingers at each other and moving around (old or new doesn’t matter: Vox=Infowars=Fox=NYT) is just shit stirring itself.