Conversation

Defining the idea of a “hobby” is surprisingly hard For example you might think low risk is part of it but many hobbies are high risk, like sailing. More so than dangerous professions. Or low impact. Many of the biggest inventions came from hobbyist tinkering.
21
52
The best I have so far is: an activity pursued with surplus time and resources, inoculated from considerations of practical returns.
4
45
A lot of hobbyists spend ruinous amounts on hobbies, to the detriment of arguably more important things like say health or marriage or kids’ needs. So I don’t know if ex-ante low-stakes is correct. 🤔
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
ex-ante low stakes, reward wise.
1
8
You also do other things in your leisure time, such as spend time with friends/family, watch movies, work on startups, take vacations... so leisure is necessary but not sufficient.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
I always thought the distinction was just that it’s something you do in your leisure time.
2
6
Hmm. This is an intriguing line of thought and I think on to something. Though hobbyist communities can have status contests too, they are easily avoided. You generally don’t need a community to pursue most hobbies.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
First snap thought is hobbies don't seem to affect your social status. They aren't risky in a way that success/failure isn't tied to others perception of you.
3
7
Replying to
This doesn't sound right to me. Golf is a hobby, right? And golf is extremely tied to social status. Hell, I once declined to join a World of Warcraft guild with new game-industry co-workers because I was worried that poor performance would embarrass me and impact my status.
1
Replying to
That seems very difficult to adjudicate and likely to result in counterintuitive answers as far as "is X a hobby." But it seems like you're trying to understand hobbyism as a phenomenon, so maybe that's OK.