Lions and domestic cats have a common ancestor but lions don’t devolve to mostly harmless. Immunity to domestic cats (we can just physically dominate them) doesn’t give us any immunity to lions. Lions aren’t a pandemic scourge for other reasons.
-
Show this thread
-
Interesting to consider the difference between a predator and a parasite. Small size and reproductive speed both matter. A lion is big enough that it can’t feed on you indefinitely keeping you alive. Let alone breed in you.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
Hmm there are only 45 recognized species of coronavirus total, of which 7 infect humans. For rhino viruses, there are 160 for humans alone. Possibly because rhinoviruses are among the smallest RNA viruses and coronaviruses are among the largest? Makes them less stable maybe?
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Sizes: Rhinoviruses: 30nm Flu viruses: 80-120nm Coronaviruses: 120nm but can range from 50 to 200 at extremes Smallpox: 300nm Domestic cats, leopards, lions/tigers, cattle. HIV is also 120nm range
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Hmm large mammals are actually a bad comparison. Viruses are as much smaller than bacteria (up to 100x) as insects are smaller than us. So we should map bacteria to predatory mammals and viruses to insects to get a better sense of proportions. Cholera = 2 μm = 2000nm
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
After all some viruses, bacteriophages, infect bacteria. Sometimes making them worse. Apparently the CTXφ bacteriophage makes cholera more severe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTX φ_bacteriophage
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Lol, we’re just a sideshow in the viruses vs bacteria war for the planet . “It is estimated there are more than 10^31 bacteriophages on the planet, more than every other organism on Earth, including bacteria, combined.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteriophage …
3 replies 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
Wonder if there’s any home-grade experiments or observations you can do with harmless bacteria that don’t require an electron microscope and won’t bring the FBI down on you. Hobby virology should be a thing.
6 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Walt 🚴🏼♂️ 🏗 🗽 🌎 ⚖️ 🙋🏻♂️ 🚮
Venkatesh Rao added,
Walt 🚴🏼♂️ 🏗 🗽 🌎 ⚖️ 🙋🏻♂️ 🚮 @WaltFrenchReplying to @vgrHistory for Coronas needn’t exactly repeat One way natural selection works is an aggressive parasite puts high evolutionary pressure on hosts It seems our innate immune system tackles most cold viruses well enough that our adaptive immune systems never train on even stable ones2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Trevor Bedford
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread
From first QT, sounds like most cold viruses don’t do enough damage to require adaptive immune response (specific antigens). I guess first response stuff like interferon works well enough?
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Yet Another N=1 “Hugely Significant” Finding— I heard today (TWIV 673) That Trump had NO COVID antibodies prior to receiving (on day 7?) REGN-COV2 antibody cocktail I am NOT an expert immunologist but it *seems* adaptive immunity is not guaranteed v COVID
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WaltFrench @vgr
More info on this point for those interested (also a great podcast at any time):https://overcast.fm/+HPZjVlu8
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.