Conversation

Is there something like a Coase for democratic politics? Firm/market/law/transaction costs/social costs? Not school civics. More like Fukuyama’s stuff or Selectorate Theory, but institutional. I’m thinking parties, media, mobs as first-order. Maybe firms and demagogues too.
5
20
Public choice theory feels more analogous to regular or behavioral economics than coasean though. 🤔 It offers analytical insights but doesn’t seem to suggest a natural and satisfying ontology. Something you could use in a toy-world simulation for eg.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Public Choice Theory is all about this.
1
1
Hmm. Maybe a direct analogy would work Firm = party Market = media Law = Overton window/pc norms etc Social costs = fake news, disinformation that distorts media the way social costs distort prices Transaction costs = cost of actually forming an opinion on an issue.
1
2
Breaking down transaction costs as we normally do: Search costs = figuring out what political issues correlate to private interests. Like realizing GDPR matters if I run a website. Negotiating costs = cost of forming an opinion Monitoring costs = cost of tracking the issue
1
1
Joining a party = joining a firm Contract = party line Main macro thing of interest in coasean economics is not gdp or interest rates but firm size distribution. By analogy, in politics it should be faction-size distribution.