Is there something like a Coase for democratic politics? Firm/market/law/transaction costs/social costs? Not school civics. More like Fukuyama’s stuff or Selectorate Theory, but institutional. I’m thinking parties, media, mobs as first-order. Maybe firms and demagogues too.
-
-
Hmm. Maybe a direct analogy would work Firm = party Market = media Law = Overton window/pc norms etc Social costs = fake news, disinformation that distorts media the way social costs distort prices Transaction costs = cost of actually forming an opinion on an issue.
Show this thread -
Breaking down transaction costs as we normally do: Search costs = figuring out what political issues correlate to private interests. Like realizing GDPR matters if I run a website. Negotiating costs = cost of forming an opinion Monitoring costs = cost of tracking the issue
Show this thread -
Joining a party = joining a firm Contract = party line Main macro thing of interest in coasean economics is not gdp or interest rates but firm size distribution. By analogy, in politics it should be faction-size distribution.
Show this thread -
Ah! This is promising. Acemoglu is the why nations fail guy.https://twitter.com/profjasonpotts/status/1316572112140734464 …
Show this thread -
Never heard of Trent Macdonald, interesting....
https://twitter.com/profjasonpotts/status/1316572726455279617 …Show this thread -
Alright, this is kinda the trailhead I was imagining should exist. Into a Roam page it goes. Thanks
@profjasonpotts
pic.twitter.com/dwi0zzch9q
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
It offers analytical insights but doesn’t seem to suggest a natural and satisfying ontology. Something you could use in a toy-world simulation for eg.