Not gonna explain my position in detail or debate the nuances of the reco. But yes, I have followed the details of this since AB 5. It’s a complicated thing but ultimately for us it’s a Y/N vote. Unlike elected reps we don’t have the luxury of haggling over details.
-
-
Show this thread
-
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like there just doesn't exist a proper classification for app-based workers. They typically do not act like full-time employees but 'independent contractor' status fails to provide them with adequate protections. P22 has a malicious clause requiring 7/8th vote to repeal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everything you say may be true, but none of it accounts for the 7/8th provision to modify the law at a later date. The Constitution itself is more flexible than this.
-
Personally, I'm currently leaning No on 22 too (with reservations), but the 7/8ths is a weird reason to me, given that by default, props can only be reversed by other props. So this is strictly better than the default.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The 7/8 clause alone is bad enough to warrant a no vote
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.