It's only Monday and this is the bar that's been set for dumbest thing I'll read this week
Conversation
Yes, yes I know it’s not actually dumb but canny clickbait to pump the rageclicks etc., but there’s a genuine phenomenon here. This really is how many of the wealthy feel, which is why Dick Costello is shorting his fellow elites and auditioning for pitchfork twirler.
2
1
25
Replying to
A $1.6M home on a $400K household income, w/young kids, is how you end up house poor. The conventional wisdom that your mortgage should be up to 25% of your gross income is ridiculous. More like your total housing costs. That house is about 20% more than they can afford.
(1/n)
1
And those daycare and preschool costs are off the charts. That's high-end even for Manhattan or San Francisco.
(2/n)
1
The rest is actually all pretty reasonable for a middle class family of four.
(Actually, a $350 car payment sounds pretty good. And even that assumes only one car payment at a time.)
(3/n)
1
But just a slightly less expensive home and more reasonable childcare choices would shave $1,500-$2,000 off that budget. At which point they're hardly "barely scraping by".
(4/n)
1
Of course, none of that takes into account what happens when you get laid off, can't find suitable work for 12+ months, coronavirus hits, COBRA coverage runs out, you have unexpected major medical expenses, etc.
It sounds wealthy, until suddently it isn't.
(5/5)
1
Replying to
The point is, there's people making an order of magnitude less and still staying alive and complaining less, who could use more humane taxpayer-funded support. It's a no-brainer that it's better to save one family from starvation than another from bank repo of a too-big house
1
1
The people in this notional family have made choices as you point out -- too much home, too-high-end childcare etc etc. They've been enabled to make these bad (for them and society) choices by bad incentives. They're not helpless. They can make new choices under new incentives.
1
1
I honestly find the presumption in the original that this notional 400k lifestyle should somehow have a privileged level of security and immune to the precarities that affect the rest of us almost offensive. Yeah shit happens. Jobs are lost. Incomes are lost. Welcome to life.
Replying to
True. But the counter-argument is that at that level, neither are they worthy of any special obligation or penalty.
I can honestly make the case for either side of this argument.
2
Replying to
Under normal circumstances I’d be inclined to bothsides this too, and give some of the benefit of doubt to the wealthy but we happen to be at a historically high level of social stress (cf Turchin theories) that correlate to serious breakdown.
1
2
Show replies

