This is not “passive income” so much as “live money.” I’m pretty bad at it. Most of my income is tied to effort-reward recipes. It’s not as deterministic as paychecks, but it’s still instrumental recipes not engines. Maybe 5% is from the engines at most.
-
Show this thread
-
New goal is to increase that 5% to maybe 15-20%. True leisure time is only created in correlation to live money. No matter how leveraged, effort correlated recipe money, dead money, can’t spin off true leisure.
1 reply 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Live money/dead money is basically like live player/dead player. It’s only live money if you can buy you Monday morning leisure time. Dead money effort recipes can only buy you evening-and-weekend leisure time. Cognitively speaking, the dregs of attention.
3 replies 0 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
And it’s only leisure activity if nothing critical or financially anxiety-provoking is riding on the outcome. If you make money off it, it’s true “free money” in psychological accounting. Free money is of course even better than live money. It’s more than live. It’s living free.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
Live-and-free money is not earned with intention and instrumental effort (dead money) or collected as a rent (live but not free money). It’s the best money because it’s a genuine surplus from freely undertaken leisure behaviors. It’s the money you’ll feel happiest spending.
6 replies 2 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
enough dead money relative to cost of living is functionally the same as live money, and the number could be a lot lower than most people think (FIRE)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @spencemo_c @vgr
(i'm living proof ... i functionally retired at 27)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @spencemo_c
Sorry, no it’s not. The whole FIRE crowd is doing what Bruce Sterling calls “acting dead”. Doing a radical cost-down of lifestyle and paying a significant social cost is not actual freedom, it’s degeneration.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Your description may be accurate in some cases but definitely isn’t universal wrt FIRE. For some (like me) it’s not about self denial but accurately calibrating what actually brings happiness and gaining freedom from wanting the (many) things that don’t.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @spencemo_c @vgr
Imo your perception of FIRE is uncharacteristically shallow and inaccurate
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I’ve tracked the subculture for a decade
-
-
Replying to @vgr
And your observation is that “paying significant social cost” is a defining characteristic? That’s not my impression but I could be wrong.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.