If you wait for pickaxes to be perfected, the gold rush will be over before you start digging.
If you insist on only using a mature toolchain/tech stack, you’ll never build anything truly worthwhile. All high value tech co-evolves with its toolchain/stack.
Conversation
Replying to
I feel like I’ve seen an earlier version of this thought somewhere years ago.
“Selling pickaxes to miners” is a terrible mental model for innovation. Mature tools sustain commoditized, fungible work. Miners digging for gold aren’t inventors or entrepreneurs. They’re gamblers.
4
2
20
Innovation work generally looks like building your own pickaxes, to dig with rather than sell to others. Because nobody sells the exact tools you need.
Selling pickaxes to miners is a better metaphor for democratization of consumption access. Shadow labor enabling.
2
4
29
This is my attempt to simplify the core idea of this thread since people keep complaining my tweets are confusing
Quote Tweet
Veblen-doer hierarchy
Science is savagery. “Hmm what happens if I eat the apple like the nice snake says?”
Engineering is barbarism: “How do I solve this problem with minimal refinement?”
Design is civilization: “How can I express Brooklyn aesthetics with maximal refinement?”
Show this thread
3
3

