Conversation

I like and agree with both these people. The prerational/rational/meta-rational framing may help understand their apparent disagreement...
Quote Tweet
We shouldn't be declaring who does and doesn't belong in the discipline of mathematics based on the political implications of their abstract philosophical beliefs about the nature mathematical objects. This is not good. twitter.com/HeatherEHeying…
Show this thread
1
37
Replying to
Hmm. Dunno. I smell a motte and bailey maneuver where you go from axiomatic relativism in the sense of say non-Euclidean geometries to pandering in bad faith to people who want to construct identitarian pedagogies.
Replying to and
For a while there was a reactionary movement in India to construct a “Vedic mathematics”. It was actually potentially interesting in a counterfactual way, like what might have happened if the Indian tradition hadn’t died out by the 18th century when European math entered.
Replying to and
For example, old Indian texts approach trigonometry with pre-Cartesian ways of thinking about sines and cosines. Might be interesting to extrapolate. Except that’s not the sort of thing “Vedic” math ideologues wanted to pursue. They basically wanted Hinduism in schools.