It is disingenuous to pretend that he is being generally precise enough to match qualifiers and claims. It’s a stream of resonant phrases that could be in almost any order. His audience is clearly listening for sentiment cues not clear arguments. It is sentiment steganography.
-
-
Ie if your attitude is “fuck nuance” be prepared to be judged on broad contours and evidence of strategic intent, not the details you clearly don’t care about. https://kieranhealy.org/files/papers/fuck-nuance.pdf …pic.twitter.com/jF2GC2kWZH
Show this thread -
There’s a syndrome here you could call “stochastic offense, deterministic defense.” When his bullshit works, oh my, he’s a master manipulator illusionist magician beating the elites at their own word games and owning the libs. When it fails “he was taken out of context!”
Show this thread -
Trump apologist trolls like Scott Adams do this a lot. When it works for them, they are masters of postmodern subjectivist solipsism, deftly weaving bullshit force fields. The only way they can be “taken” at all is “out of context.” When the bullshit blows back, whine and moan.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.