This might be the most annoying sheeple behavior in public discourse. Leaders by definition speak for followers within a limited context. If you don’t like what they say within that context, walk away. Find another leader or speak for yourself. Don’t whine at being misunderstood.
-
-
This holds true for institutional words too, cf. the kerfuffle over Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s words. A corporation is not a employee-statement-issuing body. It’s a highly asymmetric structure designed to make some people —execs and board members — count more than others.
Show this thread -
When a company speaks through it’s PR apparatus, it’s mainly the execs and board members speaking. Employees can choose to walk away, customers can stop using the product, the company can accept the cost of missing out on some talent, shareholders can dump shares.
Show this thread -
If you want to debase words so they become commodious enough to fit your views without you having to pay a real cost like quitting a job, don’t complain if they stop being useful for pointing to things of meaning things. That’s what debasement means.
Show this thread -
Words that mean everything to everybody eventually mean nothing to anybody. And words that speak meaninglessly for power don’t share that power among all being spoken for. They erode that power in proportion to the abuse.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.