I think this counts as deterministic terror rather than stochastic
-
-
Show this thread
-
The phrase is a superposition of ridiculous and scary and we won’t know which until the wave function collapses.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He played for time by asking Wallace to "give me a name" so he wouldn't have to say it. He knew what he was doing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish having that the clarity here was going to swing some in the middle. I'm afraid too many of the swing voters are privileged non-minorities, like pro-lifers who will vote for him on that issue alone. How many will see that we are all at risk from fascism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think he was trying to walk a line and self-corrected halfway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They already made it part of their logo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was my initial reaction too, but I kind of suspect it was a calculated, preemptively developed phrase - It fulfills the usual trumpian goals of signalling to the extremists that they're important, well providing deniability with the "stand back"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PB boards are already creaming themselves over it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.