Yeah testing is part of it too, in the sense of testing the boundaries of your own experience, rather than bureaucratic falsification or verification.https://twitter.com/richggall/status/1310701488730247168 …
-
Show this thread
-
Sure, Galileo tested Aristotelean realities when he turned a telescope skyward, but THAT test was not the point. It was just an effect. The real test was of the boundary of the experience of seeing. With an instrument. “Oh that’s NOT a point of light, it’s a striped ball”
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Some accounts of early science make it seem almost like Galileo’s heresies were about him choosing to fight church orthodoxy. No that was just a side effect. If you *wanted* to fight the church in medieval Europe you’d do something more direct, like nailing 99 theses to a door.
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Laura is living the espíritu navideño 🎄
Yeah experiments too... another elemental concept that’s somehow gotten bureaucratized into NSF-Approved Hypothesis-Testing Methodology. But yeah.https://twitter.com/Lauracsc_/status/1310705247883591680 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Note to self: do not use words as thread macguffins. Derails thread into isntthisjustism.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Grokking in the original Heinlein sense comes pretty close. Insight but into something outside of yourself. Except as the result of steady, patient effort. A gradual dawning of a light via a systematic uncovering of a path rather than a sudden enlightenment.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Alan Martin
‘Study’ is probably the best simple English word if you don’t want to get too weird.https://twitter.com/epithetos/status/1310695313322184704?s=21 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Paulo Coelho’s Alchemist gets at an aspect of the scientific sensibility that is often lost in modern views. That sense of a gradually dawning, cleansing, purifying light as you get closer to the essence of a thing. I especially like the alchemy connotation.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
It’s no accident that early scientists were often also astrologers and occultists. Not only is that acceptable within the scope of the verb I’m circling, it’s necessary. Superstition is inseparable from this kind of questing and not only not a threat to it, but possibly an aid.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
If you see a strong distinction between science and superstition that must be policed to keep the former “pure” and “uncorrupted” you’re paradoxically being superstitious about the essence of science. Overanxious policing of science/superstition boundary is bureaucratism.
2 replies 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread
The Hindi/Sanskrit word saadhna is another useful one with no English equivalent. Learning/study as a mindful spiritual quest. It’s often applied to learning the fine arts. The alchemist’s pursuit was saadhna. Sciencing as a developmental journey similar to learning music.
-
-
And this is why I need a mansion. To do science, one must have money, and a mansion of one’s own.
3 replies 2 retweets 14 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I like Saadhna a lot. It gets at the internal motivation and curiosity and the "seeker of truth" aspect which is what Science is all about.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.