I’m generally pro-market/capitalist but for different reasons than libertarian idealists who think the market will magically fulfill a function like weather service or environment more “efficiently.” Which means I’m pro-state in more cases, and *different* cases.
-
-
Imagine if the response to the forest fires was to privatize firefighting. You can bet the first thing the crony capitalists would do is drive legislation declaring non-approved unlicensed AQI meters illegal and take over the EPA. Control your comp metrics. Hide externalities.
Show this thread -
It would naturally be a consortium of PE types who also own private prisons and wilderness interface real estate who bid for the firefighting business. They’d figure out a way to keep rich areas clean and avoid instrumenting poor areas with sensors.
Show this thread -
And then of course they’d financialize it somehow and sell subprime fire-risk bonds on international markets.
Show this thread -
The low-tech inefficiency of state agencies is often a feature. They are slightly likelier to fail in ways that randomizecthe social cost fallout. But really we need something better than markets and states for these social-cost-dominant problems.
Show this thread -
Any situation where it’s significantly easier to capture the upside and distribute the downside unevenly in hidden places full of people who can’t easily complain (crony oligarch high-capex sectors basically) needs a new kind of post-state/post-market solution.
Show this thread -
This is one reason I’m getting interested in low-cost networked sensors. Cellphone cameras have shown that low-cost sensor networks are the worst nightmare of both repressive states AND crony-capitalists. More sensors, more widely distributed. Sonic screwdrivers for everybody.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.