Such a container could pay its own way around, and even respond to simple commands like “come to me”
You could distribute your stuff from say a 2 br apartment around the country in 100 boxes as you nomadically bum around, and then one-click have it all converge to you 😎
Conversation
Maybe a $200 *really* smart version with inner/outer camera, motorized wheels, and self-charging cord. That could physically move itself small distance across intermodal shipping leg gaps. Meet you in the parking lot for eg.
2
9
This is an apocalypse-proof way of owning stuff. You travel light, with just a couple of beige henleys and spare jeans and laptop in your backpack, plus zombie machete, but still have a mansion’s worth of stuff that’s resistant to all being looted at once by local Mad-Max gang.
3
12
You could shard your material life across say a 100 boxes in a way that any subset of 15 boxes can sustain a basic life, and any subset of 35-50 is 80% capability. No need for billionaire bunker-mansion with landing strip in Wyoming or New Zealand.
11
Containerization has basically resisted last-mile and democratization. We used a 16-foot container in one move (1-800 pack rats) and it was okay but a low-agency experience. I know people who relocate to other continents sometimes rent entire containers or share with others.
1
3
But the typical 40 foot container is just too big (=3br house). Though containers are measured in 20-foot equivalents (TEUs), actual 20-footers are now rare... and still too big a unit for consumer-scale life.
1
5
The original container totally revolutionized civilization and sparked globalization. But only at enterprise scale. Like mainframes in computing. We need a PC/mobile revolution for containerization.
3
3
13
As Feynman noted, there’s a lot of room at the bottom. Micro-containerization is the answer to all our problems. Just like homeownership was the answer to everything in 1945 or whenever.
1
1
13
You could open a whole world of sharing too. Like my gym or workshop or telescope might each be a box. I might presently be somewhere I can’t use any of them. Make them rentable. Airbnb for stuff. In a box.
Don’t even need to own or assemble myself. REIT the stuff.
1
8
I think has been thinking about a version of this stuff for the storage piece.
Basically... unbundle and rebundle “home” as a set of functional boxes.
2
6
These thoughts inspired by an annoyingly stupid family logistics situation we’re dealing with, involving sorting/moving/trashing stuff via remote control 2000 miles away, and dealing with idiotic issues of mailing keys around, figuring out who can be trusted to do what, etc.
Replying to
As with intranet opsec, we need to move from a perimeter based security/permissions model to an asset-based one. Stuff like Amazon Key is transitional tech at best. You don’t want smart homes. You want dumb stuff in smart boxes in dumb homes. amazon.com/gp/help/custom
2
1
4
The home is now like an ownership middle-mile dumb pipe between ownership and lifestyle.
2
5
You could even design a home around this concept. It would be like a mini-containerport.
1
1
3
This is really me trying to disrupt the idea of sedenterized civilization and reimagine nomadism Asia a way of life that’s NOT materially minimalist. Why *should* human mobility require material life to be crammed into a mongol yurt/caravan/RV?
2
9
Why can’t stuff — even mansion-scale stuff — move at the rare of humans? Why must humans slow themselves to the match the mobility of their stuff? Blitzlebensstil. Lightning lifestyle.
2
9
Blitzkrieg revolutionized war by moving humans at the speed of machines rather than slowing machines down to human marching pace. This could revolutionize peace by moving stuff at the speed of mobile citizens.
8
