Replicability (reproducibility) —You can see what you I saw by doing what I did — is a very weak claim. That’s why it’s so useful. Says nothing about the interpretation or theorizing or even quality of the setup. It’s just “I did this and saw this” as a starting point.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suspect the door was accidentally opened by debates over things like creationism and global warming, which devolved into debates over what "Science says." Extreme postmodernist views didn't sound so weird after that. They only take off in an already warped discourse.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Consensus is the definition of science you need if you want to use its authority without engaging with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These guys take a good shot at contact tracing the backstory.https://www.amazon.com/Cynical-Theories-Scholarship-Everything-Identity_and/dp/1634312023 …
-
Idk about the rest of it, but their understanding of philosophy in that book is truly dreadful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.