I’ve been trying for years to to adapt the warfare “generations” model to management and I think I finally have the mapping right. The problem is that while both military and business are driven by tech, the business world is also driven by regulatory forces, muddying things
-
Show this thread
-
If you make 2 assumptions, you get a roughly right and useful mapping: 1. Nth generation management generation tracks N-1th military generation 2. Shareholder value/agency theory ~1976 split the 3rd generation into 2 pieces, A and B that has no counterpart on military side
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
Up until about then, some large fraction of the male population had served too. The leadership of each is now two very different populations. Much less synchronized.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Good point. The Vietnam vet generation mostly didn’t end up in leadership to the extent WW2 vet generation did. It was those who avoided the draft who got ahead career-wise I think. They led ~85-95 or so.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.