I see; it's their support for Trump that tells you they don't have an understanding of shared humanity? As well as them saying so directly? b/c Disliking Kissinger's profit-making by the deindustrialization of America (for added green PR) is not a rejection of shared humanity.
No. I’m saying certainty/confidence in ones own unradicalness is arrogance. You are also mischaracterizing my solution. I don’t have one. I’m suggesting something inspired by Marshall plan. The shared-humanity-narrative point is just an observation. It would be nice to have.
-
-
How do I know there isn’t one already? Because I’ve been told so. I also know the role I’m personally typically cast in, within the Red story, and “peer in a shared story” ain’t it. Which is fine since there’s other stories around. Like I said, nice to have, not essential.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I encourage you to read Karl Popper "the Open Society and its Enemies"; you can get a nice, subjective understanding of radicalism from his "paradox of tolerance". It's not correctness I'm certain of--that *would* be arrogant--but my understanding and aversion to radicalization.
-
I encourage you to not sermonize strangers based on arrogant presumptions
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.