I’m arguing 3 things and it is not clear what part you object to 1. A big differential has emerged since 1980 for various reasons. Blue began thriving more economically. 2. It would be good if Red were to also begin thriving again economically 3. Blue can/should help
Nope. Not at all what I meant. Based on our conversation, seems to me you’re much more of a radical than I am. Your posture feels largely like projection. I wouldn’t be so sure you’re not the one in need of deradicalization. Luckily for you I don’t see it as my job.
-
-
The presumption that you’re the magisterially correct and non-radical judge of who is “well intentioned,” whose own intentions and non-radicalness are self-evidently obvious... needs modulation with some doubt.
-
The basis of my disagreement with you is that your solution to the economic disparity is to make the red express an understanding of shared humanity in terms you can recognize; further, you think an un-radical posture is impossible and doomed "today"; wasn't going to go there but
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.