McConnell is unpleasant, but I find it weird that people call him a hypocrite for “shamelessly” flip-flopping on nomination principles. He sees himself as a general leading a legislative war in the battlefield of the senate, not as a collegial member of an institution at piece.
-
-
Honorable is not the word--prudent is. If you keep using scorched-earth tactics, you'd best make sure you win forever. Why nations generally follow Geneva Convention. Proposals to increase Supes to 11-15, bring in four new blue states, etc., become thinkable in such an env't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So basically, you're saying it's OK, because he's just a traitor at war with the rest of us and democracy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its more like adhering to the Geneva convention. You're arguing for abandoning any moral red lines
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
The Ted Kennedy assault on Bork in the 80s followed by the "high tech lynching" created McConnell's stratagem and also served as the origins of the Federalist Society.https://youtu.be/_82v3Q-j_YY
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Though “in pieces” would work. 
“...I argued that if she died, McConnell should do the consistent and honorable thing — and refuse to act on Trump’s nominee as a way to right the grievous wrong he did in 2016